Kyiv has leveled the most serious charge of the five-year war at its most important ally. On Wednesday, Ukraine’s government accused the United States of helping Russia — first by failing to warn Kyiv of incoming missile strikes, then by hobbling the satellite communications its military depends on to fight back.
The accusation lands after two consecutive nights in which Russian ballistic missiles hit Kyiv before air-raid sirens could even sound to warn residents to take cover, according to Ukrainian officials quoted by AFP.
At the center of the row sits Elon Musk, whose company SpaceX built both Starlink, the commercial satellite-internet service that gave Ukraine a decisive communications edge early in the war, and Starshield, its military-grade counterpart. Ukrainian officials say SpaceX quietly imposed speed limits on military terminals in motion earlier this week, cutting connectivity for drones and interceptor units with no warning.
“The drones kept moving, but these interruptions made them harder to control,” Ukraine’s 7th Rapid Reaction Corps said in a statement cited by Reuters. Serhii Beskrestnov, an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, wrote on Telegram that terminals cut out once vehicles moved faster than about 100 miles per hour (160 km/h), and that no warning was given.
Musk answered on his social platform X on Wednesday, and his reply pointed the finger back at Washington: “Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS,” he wrote, referring to US President Donald Trump.
He drew a sharp line between the two systems. Starlink, he said, “is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX” whose use is limited to civilian or defensive activities — “cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.” In other words: not his company’s call.
Ukraine’s former defense minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, responded on X that connectivity at speeds up to 160 km/h was being restored and thanked Musk for his “continued support” — while insisting that “removing Starshield’s speed limit entirely is now critical for Ukraine’s defense.”
Zelenskyy himself made the appeal directly in an interview with British journalist Piers Morgan: “I hope that it’s a mistake, maybe huge technical problem. I don’t know, but we are asking to do it, to switch (it) on.”
Asked whether he felt betrayed by Trump, Zelenskyy answered: “Really, yes.”
The backdrop is a rapid deterioration in the Washington-Kyiv relationship. Trump has announced a diesel-supply deal with heavily sanctioned Russia, declared a unilateral “energy ceasefire,” and angrily blamed Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries for squeezing US fuel supplies as November’s midterm elections approach — telling voters at the pump the pain is Kyiv’s fault. A senior official in Kyiv confirmed that Washington had in recent days threatened to stop providing intelligence about Russian missile launches; Trump denied it on Tuesday.
That denial rings hollow in Kyiv, where missiles arrived with no allied warning — something Zelenskyy has called “completely unjust.”
On the same day, Zelenskyy was in London, walking a careful line. After meeting King Charles III at Buckingham Palace and Prime Minister Andy Burnham at Downing Street, he told the cameras: “We count on (our) partnership with the United States. We just want to be very honest, very clear, be strong partners.”
Burnham said Britain would accelerate delivery of lightweight multi-role missiles — the interceptors Ukraine uses against Russian jet-powered drones — and prepare fresh sanctions, promising to “repair bridges” between Trump and Zelenskyy.
Why this matters
Never before in this war has Kyiv so directly accused Washington of aiding Moscow. The charge reframes the conflict’s most lopsided relationship: Ukraine’s war effort runs through American-owned systems — US intelligence feeds, US-built satellite networks — and the US president is now treating that dependence as leverage. When a single billionaire and a single administration can decide, without warning, which drones stay connected and which cities get advance notice of missiles, the architecture of modern warfare has a choke point nobody voted for. Beyond Ukraine, every country building its military around commercial satellite networks just got a lesson in what ownership means when politics change.
2 Comments